Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Matthews et al v. Commonwealth Motels of Mississippi Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00054
Plaintiff: Glen Matthews and Grace Matthews
Defendant: Commonwealth Motels of Mississippi Inc and Rugby Broadcasters Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Ernster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00052
Plaintiff: Matthew Jacob Lee Graham
Defendant: Dale Ernster, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crabtree v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2009cv00045
Petitioner: Matthew Crabtree
Respondent: State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demarais v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00032
Plaintiff: Lane Matthew Demarais
Defendant: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Three Affiliated Tribes, Fort Berthold Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doppler et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Company et al
as 3:2008cv00103
Plaintiff: Matthew Doppler, Daniel J. Gordon and Michael Neva
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck & Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Meeches et al v. Matthew Schmidt
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff: Lena Meeches, Delores Meeches and Cecil Paul
Defendant: Matthew Schmidt
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Hunter v. Mohr et al
as 3:2007cv00112
Plaintiff: Michael H Hunter
Defendant: Matthew Mohr and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Sjothun v. USA
as 3:2007cv00091
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Matthew Sjothun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tabery v. Laughlin
as 3:2007cv00069
Plaintiff: Gerald Tabery
Defendant: Matthew Gene Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?