Cases 41 - 50 of 35,626
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-2225
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Davinder Singh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2227
Petitioner:
Davinder Singh
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Catawba Riverkeeper, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-2255
Petitioner:
Catawba Riverkeeper and Winyah Rivers Alliance
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Moreno Casquete v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv02277
Petitioner:
Harinson Moreno Casquete
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Dorcely
as 0:2024cv02264
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kendrick Dorcely
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
United States v. Katrina Shangreaux
as 24-2208
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Katrina Pauline Shangreaux, also known as Katrina White Whirlwind
United States v. Juan Gomez-Padilla
as 24-2210
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Emilio Gomez-Padilla
United States v. Dereone Williams
as 24-2199
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dereone Williams
United States v. Gordon Reese
as 24-2200
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gordon David Reese, also known as G, also known as Kenneth Reed, also known as G-Money
United States v. Christopher Stephens
as 24-2201
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher R. Stephens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
