Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Creek v. Daugarrd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03001
Plaintiff: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Defendant: Dennis Daugaard, Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landman v. Dooley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv05091
Petitioner: Burton Kenneth Landman
Respondent: Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Dooley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv04194
Petitioner: O'Dell K. Johnson
Respondent: Robert Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bauer v. Dooley
as 5:2015cv05089
Petitioner: Jeremy Bauer
Respondent: Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harold Running Bird v. Robert Dooley
as 15-3759
Petitioner: Harold Running Bird
Respondent: Robert Dooley, Chief Warden
Charles Kyle Goldsmith v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 15-3700
Plaintiff - Appellant: Charles Kyle Goldsmith
Defendant - Appellee: State of South Dakota and Corp. Warden Robert Dooley
Shawn Springer v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-3701
Petitioner - Appellant: Shawn Cameron Springer
Respondent - Appellee: Robert Dooley, Warden and Marty Jackley, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Jimmy Pilcher v. Robert Dooley
as 15-3604
Petitioner: Jimmy Pilcher
Respondent: Robert Dooley
Klaudt v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv04172
Plaintiff: Ted Alvin Klaudt
Defendant: South Dakota Department of Corrections, Robert Dooley, Lee Kaufenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lufkin v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04171
Plaintiff: Dennis Lufkin
Defendant: Robert Dooley, Jennifer Stanwich, Josh Klimek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?