Cases 81 - 90 of 219
Castonguay v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00065
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shawn Titus v. Scott Frakes
as 20-1059
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner / Appellant:
Shawn Titus
Trice v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00562
Petitioner:
De'Aris R. Trice
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Titus v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00526
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Shawn Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nathanial Mack v. Pete Ricketts, et al
as 19-3450
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather Jackson, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II (officially and individually), Richard Cruickshank, Nebraska State Penitentiary Warden (officially and individually), Jeramy Simonsen, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II and former Acting Clinical Sex Offender Programs Manager and C-Sort Vice Chair Person (officially and individually) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathanial Gerald Serrell Mack
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00492
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Doug Peterson, State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and others
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliveira-Coutinho v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00491
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Oliveira-Coutinho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Floyd, Jr. v. Scott Frakes
as 19-3304
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner / Appellant:
William C. Floyd, Jr.
Chuol v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00469
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gatdet G. Chuol
Respondent:
Scott Franks and Scott Frakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00448
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lamont R. Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
