Cases 1 - 10 of 13
State of Minnesota v. Rowland
as 0:2022cv02580
Petitioner:
State of Minnesota
Respondent:
Jesse Nikolas Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rowland v. FMHP et al
as 0:2022cv01692
Petitioner:
Jesse Rowland
Respondent:
FMHP and MSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Rowland v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02218
Plaintiff:
John Allen Rowland
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boike et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02296
Plaintiff:
Rowland Boike , Rowland Boike Farms , Mike Stephen Jorgenson and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowland v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04616
Plaintiff:
Marion Rowland
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv02834
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rowland
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho McNeil Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Reasearch & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04960
Plaintiff:
Shelia Rowland
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Industrial Technology Ventures LP v. Pleasant T. Rowland Revocable Trust et al
as 0:2010mc00060
Plaintiff:
Industrial Technology Ventures LP
Defendant:
Pleasant T. Rowland Revocable Trust, W. Jerome Frautschi Living Trust, Jerome Frautschi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
