Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lund, et al v. Certegy Check Services, Inc
as 3:2013cv03064
Plaintiff:
Marlen Lund and Karen Lund
Defendant:
Certegy Check Services, Inc and Collections Acquisition Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUND et al v. CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
MARLEN LUND and KAREN LUND
Defendant:
CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Funds up to $2,266,570.72 in checking account # 106704 at Dubuque Bank & Trust
as 1:2010mc00034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds up to $2,266,570.72 in checking account # 106704 at Dubuque Bank & Trust
United States of America v. Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Two Dollars and Seventy-Seven Cents ($7,342.77)
as 6:2008cv02017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cashier's Check in the Amount of Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Two Dollars and Seventy-Seven Cents ($7,342.77), Cashier's Check in the Amount of Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred Four Dollars ($16,904.00) and Cashier's Check in the Amount of Two Hundred Four Thousand Eighty-One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($204,081.61)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. F & M Bank Cashier's Check in the amount of $38,705.85
as 1:2007cv00088
Defendant:
F & M Bank Cashier's Check in the amount of $38,705.85
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Cashier's check for $519,486.12, et al
as 1:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cashier's Check for $519,486.12 and Cashier's check for $21,813.88
Claimant:
Jay Don McMichael
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
