Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al v. Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. et al
as 0:2012cv02671
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company , Securian Financial Group, Inc. , Securian Funds Trust and others
Defendant:
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. , Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01841
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc., Ally Bank, Ally Securities, LLC formerly known as Residential Funding Securities, LLC formerly known as Residential Funding Securities Corporation doing business as GMAC RFC Securities and others
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.), John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) Separate Account 6A, John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) Separate Account 131 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Michael Gilmor, et al v. Preferred Credit Corporation, et al
as 10-8017
Petitioner:
Michael P. Gilmor and Shellie Gilmor
Respondent:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor and others
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Missouri State Employees' Retirement System v. Credit Suisse, New York Branch f/k/a Credit Suisse First Boston, New York Branch et al
as 2:2009cv04224
Plaintiff:
Missouri State Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Credit Suisse, New York Branch f/k/a Credit Suisse First Boston, New York Branch and Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
