Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Milk v. Ripperda et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milk
Defendant:
Travis Ripperda, Unknown Persons and/or Entities System Risk Management Team, Riley DeGroot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaClaire v. Warden SD Darin Young et al
as 5:2022cv05073
Petitioner:
Will C. LaClaire
Respondent:
Warden SD Darin Young, Bob Dooley and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christians v. Christensen et al
as 4:2022cv04072
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Christians
Defendant:
Nancy Christensen, Laurie Stratman, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neels v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04053
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Neels
Respondent:
Darin Young, Bob Dooley, Brenda Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cody v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Doug Clark, Daniel Sullivan, Jennifer Dreiske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Neill et al
as 4:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Neill, Darin Young, Douglas Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Boysen et al
as 4:2021cv04186
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Defendant:
Jess Boysen, Darin Young, Troy Ponto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04167
Defendant:
Chuck Gilchrist, Brent Fluke, Rebecca Schieffer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04134
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Darin Young, Troy Ponto, Jennifer Dreiske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodraska v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04120
Plaintiff:
Richard James Woodraska
Defendant:
Darin Young, Mike Leidholt, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
