Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Woods v. Loflin et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Billy Loflin, Unknown Womack, Unknown Flint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Annesser et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Heather Annesser, Rosanna Williams, Molly Leija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wood v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kerri J. Wood
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Woods et al
as 4:2021mc00863
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John J. Woods, Livingston Group Asset Management Company doing business as Southport Capital and Horizon Private Equity, III, LLC
Receiver:
A. Cotton Wright
Woods v. Fuwell et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Taylor Fuwell, Heather Tidwell, Heather Annesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Eckenrode et al
as 6:2021cv03077
Defendant:
Carol Wilson, Kelly, Gruender and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell J Woods, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kishchenko v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 4:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Staff Attorneys, United States of America and Walter J. Wood, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Sergei Kishchenko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Bobby Woods
as 19-1893
Defendant / Appellant:
Bobby J. Woods
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
