Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Foy v. Harpool et al
as 6:2019cv03178
Defendant: Gary A Fenner, Murphy, Kelly and others
Plaintiff: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv03188
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Foy v. United States of America
as 6:2014cv03522
Plaintiff: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foy v. USA et al
as 6:2014cv03465
Petitioner: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Respondent: USA, Jett and B R Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Foy v. Pope Francis et al
as 6:2014cv03147
Petitioner: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Respondent: Pope Francis, Dajjal, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03464
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03334
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AL-MAHDI v. NEW WORLD ORDER H.Q.'S AT THE BILDERBERG GROUP IN SWISS. GENEVA.1211. HEADQUATERS (SUPER-RICH DEVIL WORSHIPPERS) IN GENEVA-SWISS. 1211
as 6:2013cv03184
Petitioner: JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY AL-MAHDI
Respondent: NEW WORLD ORDER H.Q.'S AT THE BILDERBERG GROUP IN SWISS. GENEVA.1211. HEADQUATERS (SUPER-RICH DEVIL WORSHIPPERS) IN GENEVA-SWISS. 1211
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Foy v. Sanders
as 6:2012cv03464
Petitioner: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Respondent: Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foy v. Holder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv03463
Petitioner: Joaquin Irwin Foy
Respondent: Eric Holder , Barack Obama , U.S. Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?