Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Puente v. Cantrell Gainco Group, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05166
Plaintiff:
Salvador Puente
Defendant:
Cantrell Gainco Group, Inc. and John Doe Companies A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Almendinger, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Almendinger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jose Puentes Carranza v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-2017
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States
Petitioner:
Jose Saul Puentes Carranza
Puente v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2020cv03051
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Sabina Puente and Sabina A Puente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Malaquias Ortiz-Puentes, et al v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 11-1308
Petitioner:
Malaquias Ortiz-Puentes, Juan Ortiz-Puentes and Mari Consuelo Ortiz-Puentes
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Malaquias Ortiz-Puentes, et al v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 10-2793
Petitioner:
Malaquias Ortiz-Puentes, Juan Ortiz-Puentes and Mari Consuelo Ortiz-Puentes
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Antonio Quinone
as 10-2404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Antonio Quinones, also known as Antonio Q. Puente
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
