Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Thomas Podraza, et al v. Richard Whiting, et al
as 14-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Podraza, Dennis Doucet, Jan Arnett and others
Plaintiff:
Patriot Coal Investor Group, Ernesto Espinoza, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, John Ziants and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard M. Whiting and Mark N. Schroeder
Movant:
James Karas, Denis Dehne, Cambridge Retirement System and others
Lowery v. Whiting et al
as 4:2012cv02167
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lowery , James Schmitt , Karel Rybacek and others
Defendant:
Richard M. Whiting and Mark N. Schroeder
Movant:
James Karas , Denis Dehne , Patriot Coal Investor Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rogers III v. Whiting et al
as 4:2012cv01815
Defendant:
Richard M Whiting and Mark N. Schroeder
Plaintiff:
Furman Jerry Rogers III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Espinoza v. Whiting et al
as 4:2012cv01711
Defendant:
Richard M. Whiting and Mark N. Schroeder
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bozard v. Brown et al
as 4:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
Randall Bozard
Defendant:
Bobby R. Brown, Irl F. Engelhardt, John E. Lushefski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonafede et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02571
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bonafede, Jessie A. Burns, Robert Falance and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Baer et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv01541
Plaintiff:
John W. Baer, John W. Baer, Sandra L Baer and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
