General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 348
James Nesby v. Daniel Cuevas
as 23-55505
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES NESBY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN DANIEL CUEVAS
Leon Daniels v. Ryan Thornell, et al
as 23-15851
Petitioner / Appellant: LEON JEROME DANIELS
Respondent / Appellee: RYAN THORNELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Daniel Wilson v. Siskiyou County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 23-15526
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL K. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee: SISKIYOU COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SISKIYOUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, KAREN DIXON, Judge and others
Daniel Griffin v. Jason Bennett, et al
as 23-35221
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL RYAN GRIFFIN
Respondent: ROBERT FERGUSON
Respondent / Appellee: RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Ossie Slaughter v. Daniel White
as 23-35202
Plaintiff / Appellant: OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL WHITE, Superintendent
Daniel Robbins v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 23-15303
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL ROBBINS
Respondent / Appellee: JERRY HOWELL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Antoine Reed v. Daniel Paramo
as 23-55119
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTOINE D. REED
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Bradley Knox v. Daniel White
as 23-35078
Petitioner / Appellant: BRADLEY DAVID KNOX
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL W. WHITE, Superintendent of Washington Corrections Center
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant: GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee: Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Daniel Billman v. Gutierrez
as 23-15076
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL BENSON BILLMAN
Respondent / Appellee: GUTIERREZ, First name unknown; named as Warden Gutierrez, USP Tucson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?