Cases 51 - 60 of 369
David Webb v. Enterprise Holdings, LLC, et al
as 22-35690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, LLC, JESSICA RIVERA SINK, Assistant Manager, Enterprise Rental Car Port Orchard Washington, KEYBANK/KEYCORP and others
Robert Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, et al
as 22-35689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BONDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, HOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY, ROBIN SPENCER, Apartment Manager for Carbridge Real Estate Services and others
Arsen Manson v. State of California, et al
as 22-55758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARSEN MANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Webb v. Enterprise Holdings, LLC, et al
as 22-35639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, LLC, JESSICA RIVERA SINK, Assistant Manager, Enterprise Rental Car Port Orchard Washington, KEYBANK/KEYCORP and others
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 22-55747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CHAVEZ, AKA Chief Maestro Chavez, AKA Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant / Appellee:
JERMILL PENNINGTON, Property Manager
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 22-55741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Warren Bell v. David Olson, et al
as 22-35577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN E. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID OLSON, Washington State Patrol Officer, AUTUM KOSTELECKY and SNOHOMISH COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 22-55699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
