Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Brian Boquist v. Peter Courtney, et al
as 23-35535
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRIAN J. BOQUIST
Defendant / Appellant: BRENDA KAY BAUMGART, in their official capacity as contract investigators to the Oregon State Senate and all in their official capacities in the Legislative Branch of the State of Oregon, PETER COURTNEY, Oregon State Senate President, in his individual and official capacities, MELISSA J. HEALY, in their official capacity as contract investigators to the Oregon State Senate, and all in their official capacities in the Legislative Branch of the State of Oregon and others
Darnell Hicks v. Floyd Bradford, III, et al
as 23-55059
Plaintiff / Appellee: DARNELL HICKS
Defendant / Appellant: FLOYD S. BRADFORD III
Defendant: ELIZABETH STRUMP, IAN MILES CHEONG, LAKEWOOD CA REGIONAL CRIME AWARENESS, PREVENTION AND SAFETY GROUP and others
Michael Floyd v. SJPD, et al
as 22-16243
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD
Defendant / Appellee: SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SAN JOSE, City Clerk, CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY and others
Abukar Abdulle, et al v. Robert Sillen, et al
as 22-15319
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABUKAR ABDULLE, RUBEN ARECHIGA, GARLAND BAKER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT SILLEN, Former Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services and JOHN CLARK KELSO, Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services
Brian Boquist v. Peter Courtney, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35080
Defendant / Appellee: BRENDA KAY BAUMGART, in her official capacity as contract investigators to the Oregon State Senate, PETER COURTNEY, Oregon State Senate President, in his official capacity, MELISSA J. HEALY, in her official capacity as contract investigators to the Oregon State Senate, and all in their official capacities in the Legislative Branch of the State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN J. BOQUIST
Floyd Morrow, et al v. City of San Diego, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-56642
Plaintiff - Appellant: FLOYD L. MORROW and MARLENE MORROW, individually, as taxpayers of the City of San Diego, State of California, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a charter city
Defendant: MANDEL E. HIMELSTEIN, an individual and DOES 1-100
Paolo Pronesti v. Department of Child and Family, et al
as 17-15717
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAOLO PRONESTI
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES CLARK COUNTY NEVADA, ELIZABETH FLOYD and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE CLARK COUNTY NEVADA FAMILY DIVISION
Sue Eicherly, et al v. Kathleen O'Leary, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55446
Plaintiff - Appellant: SUE EICHERLY, FLOYD CHODOSH, MYRLE MOORE and others
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN O'LEARY, individually, and in her capacity as Presiding Justice of the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Div. 3, WILLIAM F. RYLAARSDAM, individually, and in his capacity as a former justice of Div. 3, WILLIAM W. BEDSWORTH, individually, and in his capacity as a justice of Div. 3 and others
ALDF, et al v. Lawrence Wasden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35960
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF IDAHO and others
Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Idaho
Amicus Curiae: PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION, IDAHO BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, FOOD LAW & POLICY SCHOLARS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16143
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?