Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16490
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, VOTO LATINO and PRIORITIES USA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant:
KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona, LARRY NOBLE, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Apache County Recorder, DAVID STEVENS, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, previously named as David Stephens and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
YUMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE
Kari Lake, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 22-16413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Defendant / Appellee:
KATIE HOBBS, Arizona Secretary of State, BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Elizabeth Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, et al
as 22-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ROSE WILLIAMS, on behalf of V.E.W. and M.R.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY, an Agent for the State of Arizona, ARIZONA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, an Agent for the State of Arizona, PAUL E. TANG, an Arizona resident, Retired Judge listed agent for Arizona Superior Court of Pima County and the United States District of Arizona and others
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Arek Fressadi v. Kathryn Glover, et al
as 18-15310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AREK FRESSADI
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN ANN GLOVER, ROD ROBERTSON ENTERPRISES, INC., COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Arek Fressadi v. Kathryn Glover, et al
as 17-17092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AREK FRESSADI
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN ANN GLOVER, ROD ROBERTSON ENTERPRISES, INC., COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Patricia Bauerle v. Patricia Bauerle, et al
as 17-15544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA BAUERLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BAUERLE, GREGORY A. SMITH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Pima County Office of Children, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 16-17274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIMA COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN'S COUNSEL, as Guardian Ad Litem for A.E., a minor and ROBERT E., named as Robert E., A.E.'s father, in his own right
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, BRANDY FULLER, individually and in her capacity as an employee of the State of Arizona, DANIELLE REIHER, individually and in her capacity as an employee of the State of Arizona and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
