Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Election Integrity Project California, Inc., et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 23-55726
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, MARK REED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, SHANNON BUSHEY, Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters and others
Garred Norman v. State Bar of California, et al
as 23-16105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, BAY AREA LEGAL AID and others
Robert Newell v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-55611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT H. NEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
JACKIE LACEY, in her official capacity as the District Attorney of Los Angeles County
Amicus Curiae:
EUGENE VOLOKH
Martin Malberg v. Allison Dundas, et al
as 23-15764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MALBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLISON DUNDAS, personal & professional capacities, ROBERT CASHEN, personal & professional capacities, DEANNA LAO and others
B & L Productions, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-55431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
B & L PRODUCTIONS, INC., DBA Crossroads of the West, BARRY BARDACK, RONALD J. DIAZ, Sr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his personal capacity, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and in his personal capacity, KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of California Department of Food & Agriculture and in his personal capacity and others
Camille Bourque, et al v. Engineers and Architects Association, et al
as 23-55369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMILLE BOURQUE, individual and PETER MOREJON, individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION, a labor organization, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 23-15473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Michael Craine v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipa, et al
as 23-55206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CRAINE
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 36, LOCAL 119, an employee organization, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public agency and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Deborah Cooney v. Molly Dwyer, et al
as 23-15236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, SUSAN Y. SOONG, Clerk of Court, Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, LYNMOORE AT LAWNWOOD ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE and others
Michael Couris, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 23-55069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COURIS and MICHAEL FITZGIBBONS
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, WILLIAM J. PRASIFKA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Intervenor:
LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
