Cases 1 - 10 of 561
Maximo Diazleal-Diazleal v. James Key
as 23-35472
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAXIMO DIAZLEAL-DIAZLEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES KEY, Superintendent
Randall Chirrick v. Brad Cain
as 23-35448
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL S. CHIRRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Inst.
Dan Phillips v. Jason Bennett
as 23-35430
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAN A. PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Correctional Center
Dale Brooks v. Jamie Miller, et al
as 23-35391
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIEN EUGENE BROOKS and DALE EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Respondent:
STATE OF OREGON
Ernie Perez v. Brad Cain
as 23-35373
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNIE JUNIOR PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctioanl Institution
Jaspal Gill v. Donald Holbrook
as 23-35363
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASPAL SINGH GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
Kebede Abawaji v. Dan White
as 23-35300
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEBEDE ABAWAJI
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN WHITE, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex
James Thornton v. Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution Health Ser, et al
as 23-35293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES THORNTON
Defendant / Appellee:
EASTERN OREGON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION HEALTH SERVICES, SAUER, Mr.;Correctional Officer at EOCI, BROWN, C/O at EOCI;Mr. and others
Ernesto Carinio v. Earl Houser
as 23-35237
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNESTO CARINIO
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, State of Alaska Dept of Correction Superintendent III
Daniel Griffin v. Jason Bennett, et al
as 23-35221
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL RYAN GRIFFIN
Respondent:
ROBERT FERGUSON
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
