Cases 121 - 130 of 220
Clifford Winkles v. USDC-AZT
as 14-70208
:
In re: CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
LOUIS W. WINN, Jr.
Clifford Ritter, et al v. USA
as 14-55100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD E. RITTER, husband and wife and CAROL J. RITTER, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Whitmore v. USDC-CALA
as 13-74377
:
In re: THOMAS CLIFFORD WHITMORE
Petitioner:
THOMAS CLIFFORD WHITMORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Iroegbu Esomonu v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74353
Petitioner:
IROEGBU CLIFFORD ESOMONU
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Eric Dover v. Rick Barber, et al
as 13-36183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC A. DOVER, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK BARBER, ALJ, JIM PECK, MD, JOSEPH THALER and others
Marciano Plata, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-17506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARCIANO PLATA, OTIS SHAW, RAY STODERD and others
Petitioner - Appellee:
MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Dr., Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOHN CHIANG, California State Controller and others
Clifford Winkles v. Louis Winn, Jr.
as 13-16894
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Respondent - Appellee:
LOUIS W. WINN, Jr.
Clifford Winkles v. USDC-CALA
as 13-72920
:
In re: CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Clifford Winkle
as 13-56376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MARCUS WINKLES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
