Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Daniel Matthews v. Debra Hascall, et al
as 19-35949
Defendant:
CITY OF PENDLETON, COUNTY OF UMATILLA, OR, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PECK, Assistant Superintendent at EOCI, MITCH MORROW, Deputy Director of ODOC, RILEY, Correctional Officer at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Craig Ross, et al v. P. White, et al
as 19-55900
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY PASTERNACK, MONIQUE SHAY, FRAMROZE M. VIRJEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG ROSS and NATALIE OPERSTEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Bradley v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 18-35498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD E. BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, K. SMITH, Sgt., SRCI Property Officer and J. TAYLOR, Lt., SRCI Grievance Coordinator
Brian Jeremiah v. Aly, et al
as 18-35450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN A. JEREMIAH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALY, Sgt., JOE CAPPS, Hearings Officer, PARKS, Lt., SRCI and others
USA v. Janice Taylor, et al
as 18-10193
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR, AKA Sue J. Taylor
Movant - Appellant:
RONALD J. MCBRIDE and DESIREE E. SAUNDERS
Timothy McNair v. Maureen Rossi, et al
as 17-35880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LUTHER MCNAIR, Minister
Defendant - Appellee:
MAUREEN ROSSI, ROJAS, Ms., B. DOMAN and others
Timothy McNair v. B. Cain, et al
as 17-35834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LUTHER MCNAIR, Minister
Defendant - Appellee:
B. CAIN, M. NOOTH, TIMBLIN, Mr. and others
Karl Hall v. State of Oregon, et al
as 17-35422
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARL MORGAN HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and J. TAYLOR
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 16-35917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, ANNA M. JOYCE, BENJAMIN N. GUTMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
