Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Aceworld Holdings PTY LTD, et al
as 19-16771
Defendant / Appellant:
TFW CORPORATE PTY LTD, KHAKI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD, ACEWORLD HOLDINGS PTY LTD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Kevin Kemper v. United States Department of Vo
as 17-15523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KEMPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, named as: US Department of Voc Rehab Phoenix, AZ
Warren Mitchell v. Clackamas River Water, et al
as 16-35999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLACKAMAS RIVER WATER, MICHAEL CARDWELL, KENNETH HUMBERSTON and others
Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water, et al
as 16-35884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA HOLLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLACKAMAS RIVER WATER, LEE E. MOORE, Jr., DEAN MARK PHILLIPS and others
Isaac Hudson, Jr. v. Workers Compensation Appeals B, et al
as 14-56054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC HUDSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, LUCKY INC STORE, ALBERTSON, INC. STORE and others
Jose Martinez v. NPL Construction Co., et al
as 13-17063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NPL CONSTRUCTION CO., CAVIN DONNELL, RICARDO PRINGLE and others
Jeffrey Sharp v. Christian Stringer, et al
as 13-35465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SHARP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN STRINGER, CAROL CALLAHAN, SHAWN HOUCK and others
Jeffrey Sharp v. Christian Stringer, et al
as 12-35977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SHARP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN STRINGER, CAROL CALLAHAN, SHAWN HOUCK and others
Winston Kemper v. James Yate
as 12-16446
Petitioner - Appellant:
WINSTON KEMPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
