Cases 11 - 16 of 16
M. M., et al v. Lafayette School District, et al
as 10-16903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. M. and E. M., individually and on behalf of the minor son, C.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency, LAFAYETTE BOARD OF EDUCATION, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (CDE) and others
Robert Garcia v. M. Lunes, et al
as 10-15944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
M. LUNES, Correctional Officer, A. DIAZ, Correctional Lieutenant, M. M. MILLER, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et al v. M&M Petroleum Services, Inc., et al
as 09-56686
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., a corporation and CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY, FKA ChevronTexaco Products Company, a division of Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
M&M PETROLEUM SERVICES, INC., a corporation and MANSOOR GHANEEIAN
Resilient Floor Covering Pensi, et al v. M&M Installation, Inc., et al
as 09-17047
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION PLAN
Defendant - Appellant:
M&M INSTALLATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
SIMAS FLOOR CO., INC., a California corporation
Resilient Floor Covering Pensi, et al v. M&M Installation, Inc., et al
as 09-17064
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
M&M INSTALLATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
SIMAS FLOOR CO., INC., a California corporation
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. M&M Petroleum Services, Inc.
as 09-56427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
M&M PETROLEUM SERVICES, INC., a corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
