Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Harry Williby v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 08-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant: HARRY J. WILLIBY
Defendant - Appellee: JEANNE S. WOODFORD, TOM L. CAREY, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Edward Jones v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 08-56798
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD C. JONES
Respondent - Appellee: RICHARD A. RIMMER, Acting Dirctor of the CA Dept. of Corrections and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of California Department of Corrections
Eric Charles Knapp v. C. M. Harrison, et al
as 08-56629
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee: C. M. HARRISON, ALLEN, ALVARADO and others
Branda Allen v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 08-16118
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANDA ALLEN
Defendant: JEANNE S. WOODFORD, RICHARD RIMMER, ROSANNE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellant: NON-PARTIES STATE, Custodian of Records, CDCR Office of Legal Affairs Custodian of Records, CDCR Office of Contract Services Tom Watkins, HCCP Analyst, Central California Women's Facility Steven Brewer, Correctional Health Service Administrator, Central C
Cousins v. Lockyer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-17216
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM HENRY COUSINS
Defendant - Appellee: BILL LOCKYER, (former) Attorney General of California, in his official capacity, RICHARD RIMMER, (former) Director of the CaliforniaDepartment of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), in his individual capacity and MICHAEL MARTEL, (former) Warden of Mule Creek State (in her individual capacity)
Cuevas, et al v. State of CA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-15403
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARMANDO CUEVAS and HEATHER BURLETTE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JON DEROCO, THE EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Defendant: RICK RIMMER and SHARON JACKSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?