Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Cody Leavitt v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 13-15938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CODY LEAVITT
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, L. C. ADAMS, C.N. III, D. K. JENNINGS, D.O.N. II and others
Deann Wiesner v. Phillip Pro, et al
as 13-15653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANN WIESNER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP M. PRO, JAMES MAHAN, PEGGY LEEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Estes v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-35607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LEE ESTES
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COYOTE RIDGE CORRECTIONS CENTER, SCANTLIN, Hearings Officer and others
Steven Montes v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-16515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ARTHUR MONTES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CITY OF TUCSON, COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Kevin Estes v. USDC-WAESP
as 12-71853
:
In re: KEVIN LEE ESTES
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE ESTES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COYOTE RIDGE CORRECTIONS CENTER, SCANTLIN, Hearings Officer and others
Thomas Creech, et al v. Brent Reinke, et al
as 12-35453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. CREECH, JAMES H HAIRSTON, RICHARD A. LEAVITT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, KEVIN KEMPF, Chief, Operations Division, Idaho Department of Correction, JEFF ZMUDA, Deputy Chief, Bureau of Prisons, Idaho Department of Correction and others
Richard Leavitt v. A. Arave
as 12-35450
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. LEAVITT
Respondent - Appellee:
A. J. ARAVE
Richard Leavitt v. A. Arave, Warden
as 12-35427
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. LEAVITT
Respondent - Appellee:
A. J. ARAVE
Anthony Gantt v. Kristina Wildeveld, et al
as 11-17118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY GANTT
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTINA WILDEVELD, MICHAEL DOUGLAS, MILISSA DELA GARZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
