Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alfred Caraffa v. ADOC, et al
as 22-16426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden of ASPC - Tucson, WESTFAULT, Unknown:named as c/o III Westfault and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Angela Nails v. Cory Carpenter
as 22-15946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORY CARPENTER
Douglas Shields v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-15922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. SHIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, DWAYNE BAZE, TAMARA BRTEL and others
Janis Wolf v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado
as 22-15233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANIS WOLF, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CARPENTER, HAZLEWOOD, DELGADO & BOLEN, LLP
Brenda Johnson v. USA, et al
as 22-35044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Aaron Raiser v. City of Temecula, et al
as 21-56181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON RAISER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, JON WADE, Temecula City Police Officer, individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
