Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Gregorio Funtanilla, Jr. v. David Tristan, et al
as 09-17180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORIO C. FUNTANILLA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, J. S. BLOXOM, T. J. GODIN and others
O'Dell Smith v. J. Woodford
as 09-16654
Petitioner - Appellant:
O'DELL EUGENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD
Floyd Smith v. J. Woodford, et al
as 09-15958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD SMITH, AKA Raylon Macon
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, T. P. GOUGHNOUR, D. DACANAY and others
David Arisman v. J. Woodford, et al
as 09-15637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ARISMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, Warden, GRAY DAVIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Kamal Roy v. George Bush, Jr., et al
as 09-15453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, Jr., U.S. SENATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Karluk Mayweathers v. J. Woodford, et al
as 08-56835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLUK MAYWEATHERS, AKA Karluk Khan Mayweathers
Defendant - Appellee:
J S WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, N GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals, S RYAN, Acting Warden and others
Douglas Clark v. S. Petrakis, et al
as 08-17458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
S. PETRAKIS, J. S. WOODFORD, K. NUNEZ and others
Fred Jackson, Jr. v. R. Rowlett, et al
as 08-16957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED LEON JACKSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. ROWLETT, J. ELIAS, Correctional Sgt., K. W. CARROLL, Correctional Lt. and others
Abel Olivo v. James Yates, et al
as 08-16734
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABEL OLIVO
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES and J. S. WOODFORD
Kami Burgoyne v. J. Woodford, et al
as 08-56072
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAMI MACHELLE BURGOYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, Director, State of California Department of Corrections, DORA SCHRIRO, Director, State of Arizona Department of Corrections and DUANE BELCHER, Chairman Arizona Board of Executive Clemency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
