Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 64
California Medical Association, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55875
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant: ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director, California Department of Health Care Services and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Gordian Medical, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 12-55853
Plaintiff - Appellant: GORDIAN MEDICAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services
David Boyle v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 12-55627
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55623
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55554
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, LONNY SLOCUM, an individual and GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Association, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55550
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Hospital Assoc., et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55535
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, G. G., an individual, I. F., an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Ronald Fournier, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15478
Plaintiff: RONALD FOURNIER
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELORES BERG and THOMAS DICECCO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55334
Plaintiff - Appellee: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation and LONNY SLOCUM, an individual
Defendant: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?