Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Mark Phelps v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-17071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, JASON RAMIREZ, DAVID STINSON and others
International Franchise Associ, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 14-35866
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION, INC., CHARLES STEMPLER, KATHERINE LYONS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SEATTLE, a Municipal Corporation and FRED PODESTA, Director of the Department of Finance and Administratve Services
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
MARTINA PHELPS, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION HEALTHCARE 1199NW and others
Kevin Andrews v. Rimrock Meadows Association, et al
as 14-35430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIMROCK MEADOWS ASSOCIATION, KEVIN DANBY, MICHAEL WYMAN and others
Edward Sialoi, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 14-55387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD SIALOI, KELLI SIALOI, FOLENI SIALOI and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALLEN SLUSS, BRADLEY PHELPS and others
Marco Saldana Flores v. Luke Bighouse, et al
as 13-36072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO SALDANA FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
LUKE BIGHOUSE, PHILLIP SATTERFIELD, GRANDVIEW ON THE LAKE and others
Kevin Phelps v. Rick Hill
as 13-16885
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN PHELPS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Arthur Phelps v. Rick Hill
as 13-15301
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR ERIC PHELPS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Kevin Phelps v. Rick Hill
as 12-16943
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN PHELPS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Dennis Hellervik, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 12-56373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS HELLERVIK and THO HELLERVIK
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY (USA), INC., sued individually and as successor in interest to Mundet Cork Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
