Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae: IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56329
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 20-56297
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Francisco Munoz Ortiz v. William Barr, et al
as 20-36050
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN LANGFORD, Warden, Tacoma Northwest Detention Center, NATHALIE ASHER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office Director (Tacoma ICE) and others
Petitioner: FRANCISCO MUNOZ ORTIZ
Carlos Vargas-Gutierrez v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-73535
Respondent: TONY H. PHAM, Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner: CARLOS VARGAS-GUTIERREZ
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56257
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Does 1-16 v. USDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56234
Defendant / Appellee: TONY H. PHAM, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOES, 1 through 16, inclusive
Simon Ortiz Vargas v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-17223
Petitioner: SIMON ORTIZ VARGAS
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity, San Francisco Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Jenny Flores v. William Barr, et al
as 20-56052
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Miliam Borjas-Borjas v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16957
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, COREY PRICE, in his official capacity as Interim Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant: MILIAM MARGARITA BORJAS-BORJAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?