Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Studs Terkel, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUDS TERKEL, (now deceased), BARBARA FLYNN CURRIE, DIANE C. GERAGHTY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORP., ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO., DBA AT&T Illinois and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Dennis Riordan, et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al
as 09-16685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS P. RIORDAN, EDWARD GERARD DE BONIS, ROBERT S. GERSTEIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a corporation and VERIZON
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Tash Hepting, et al
as 09-16670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, CAROLYN JEWEL and others
Tom Campbell, et al v. AT&T Communications of Califor, et al
as 09-16684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM CAMPBELL, GEORGE MAIN, DENNIS P. RIORDAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation and AT&T CORP., a corporation
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
James Arunga, et al v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al
as 09-16423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. ARUNGA and DOREEN H. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, NICOLE OZER, Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director, ACLU, Northern CA, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and others
The American Civil Liberties U, et al v. Catherine Masto, et al
as 09-16008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA and DOES 1-8, and Does A-S
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, GERALD HAFEN, Director of the Nevada Department of Public Safety, BERNARD W. CURTIS, Chief, Parole and Probation Division of the Nevada Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL HALEY, Sheriff of the Washoe County Sheriff's Office, MICHAEL POEHLMAN, Chief of the Reno Police Department, RICHARD GAMMICK, District Attorney of Washoe County and others
Jerry Valdivia, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
as 09-15836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, State of California
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA THE JUSTICE POLICY INSTITUTE LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS AND CHILDERN THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY THE SENTENCING PROJECT
USA v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.
as 09-30160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD KRIESEL, Jr.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
Powell's Books, Inc., et al v. John Kroeger, et al
as 09-35153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al
as 09-35154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
