Cases 31 - 37 of 37
James Battle v. Tonya Wick, et al
as 09-35434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BATTLE
Defendant:
TONYA WICK
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA HOLLY, GENE SHALLER, WILLIE DAEGO and others
In re: Douglas Ray, et al v. Battle Ground Plaza, LLC
as 09-60005
Debtor:
In re: DOUGLAS RAY
Appellant:
BATTLE GROUND PLAZA, LLC
Appellee:
DOUGLAS RAY, ESTATE OF IRWIN JESSEN and DEAN MALDONADO
South Fork Band Council of We, et al v. DOI, et al
as 09-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTH FORK BAND COUNCIL OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA, TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and GERALD M. SMITH, District Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
BARRICK CORTEZ, INC.
Lynn Hust v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 09-35102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN ANN HUST
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DAVE FREUDENTHAL, Governor of the State of Wyoming and others
Karal Battle-El v. Lance Knapp, et al
as 08-56782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARAL HASANI EFIA BATTLE-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE A. KNAPP, MARY F. HUTSON and NEBRASKA EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, State Office Buld., 5th Floor, 301 Centennial Mall, South, P.O. Box 94934, Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-4934
USA v. Jeffrey Battle
as 08-35173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY LEON BATTLE
Te-Moak Tribe Wester, et al v. DOI, et al
as 07-16336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, WESTERN SHOSHONE DEFENSE PROJECT and GREAT BASIN MINE WATCH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ROBERT V. ABBEY, State Director, GAIL G. GIVENS, Assistant Field Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
CORTEZ GOLD MINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
