Cases 31 - 40 of 376
Kenneth Curry v. Vancouver Housing Authority, et al
as 18-35467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH TAYLOR CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
VANCOUVER HOUSING AUTHORITY, joint and several and ROY JOHNSON, in his official & private capacity; joint and several
Dennis Hooper v. North Bend City/Coos-Curry, et al
as 17-35680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS RUSSELL HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH BEND CITY/COOS-CURRY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LISA LUCERO, in her official capacity and as an individual and LARRY SCARBROUGH, in his official capacity and as an individual
Dennis Hooper v. USHUD, et al
as 17-35674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS RUSSELL HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and COOS-CURRY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Dennis Hooper v. USHUD, et al
as 17-35630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS RUSSELL HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and COOS-CURRY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Dennis Hooper v. USHUD, et al
as 17-35629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS RUSSELL HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and COOS-CURRY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Keith Currie v. Robert Bannister, et al
as 17-15528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CURRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BANNISTER, NDOC Medical Director, KAREN GEDNEY, M.D. and VERONICA VAN HORN, P.A.
Jerry Dunson, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 17-15257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JERRY DUNSON, CHERYL GRECH, ROBERT FLANAGAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Billy Curry v. Sandra Alfaro
as 17-55136
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY JAMES CURRY
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDRA ALFARO
Cliffton Currie v. Randy Ground
as 16-16940
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFTON RAY CURRIE
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Jerry Dunson, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80139
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JERRY DUNSON, CHERYL GRECH, ROBERT FLANAGAN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
