Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Morshed Alam v. Chuck Keeton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16825
Respondent / Appellee: OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JASON CILIBERTI, Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MORSHED ALAM
Imran Imon v. Keeton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16596
Respondent / Appellee: JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHUCK KEETON, in his official capacity as Warden of the La Palma Correctional Center, CESAR TOPETE, in his official capacity as Assistnat Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: IMRAN HOSSAIN IMON
Jhonnatan Brinez Urdaneta, et al v. Keeton, et al
as 20-16363
Respondent: FRED FIGUEROA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Eloy Detention Center, ALBERT R. CARTER, in his official capacity as Acting Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: BISMER RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ, LANDY SANCHEZ RAMOS, CLAUDIA AVALOS INCHICAQUE and others
Nak Chhoeun, et al v. David Marin, et al
as 20-55665
Petitioner: ANG THOEUN, SOKHAN KHIM, THELH KETH and others
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Field Office Director, Los Angeles Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID W. JENNINGS, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Abdul Mirzada v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-71626
Respondent: WENDELL ANDERSON, Sheriff-Coroner at Yuba County Detention Facility, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner: ABDUL GHAFFAR MIRZADA
Hamidullah Habibi v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55506
Petitioner / Appellant: HAMIDULLAH HABIBI
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55492
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jane Doe, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-15850
Defendant / Appellee: MARK A. MORGAN, Commissioner, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFREY SELF, Commander, Arizona Joint Field Command and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JANE DOE, # 2 and JANE DOE, # 1
Jane Doe, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-15741
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFREY SELF, Commander, Arizona Joint Field Command, RODNEY S. SCOTT, Chief, U.S. Border Patrol,, MANUEL PADILLA, Jr., Chief Patrol Agent-Tucson Sector and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE DOE, # 1, JANE DOE, # 2 and NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Sai v. David Pekoske, et al
as 20-15615
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAI, on Plaintiff's own behalf, and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID P. PEKOSKE, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?