Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 892
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55760
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Bridget Ward, et al v. Crow Vote, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-56108
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIDGET WARD and LISA WARD, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: CROW VOTE, LLC, DARRIN AUSTIN and EDWARD MATNEY
Kimberly Newman, et al v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-16202
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLY CARLESTE NEWMAN, LISA CABRERA, CATHERINE JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: GOOGLE, LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC
Defendant: ALPHABET, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Naomi Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 23-55475
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAOMI BAR-LEV
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, JONATHAN DUNGAN, JASON LANGLEY and others
Gary Dubin, et al v. Supreme Court State of Hawaii, et al
as 21-16863
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARY VICTOR DUBIN, individually and on behalf of all Hawaii attorneys similarly situated, DBA Dubin Law Offices, CHRISTIE ADAMS, TORU AKEHI and others
Defendant / Appellee: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, in its legislative rule-making capacity and in its judicial capacity, THE HONORABLE MARK E. RECKENWALD, in his official capacity while serving as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, THE HONORABLE PAULA A. NAKAYAMA, in her official capacity while serving as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii and others
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner: JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent: LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Young v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-1554
Not Yet Classified: AZ YUMA LIBRARIAN
Appellant: BRITTIAN WILLIE YOUNG, SR.
Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Rune Kraft v. Valerie Fairbank, et al
as 23-16048
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUNE KRAFT
Defendant / Appellee: VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, M MARGARET MCKEOWN, JOHN F WALTER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?