Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Confederated Tribes and Bands v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Tr, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-35165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, JOHN J. MANFREDA, in his offiical capacity as Administrator of the Alcohol and Tabacco Tax and Trade Bureau, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Nick Coons, et al v. Timothy Geithner, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-15324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK COONS and ERIC N. NOVACK, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clifford Johnson v. United States Department of th, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-16775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER
Michael Dragovich, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 12-16628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ANNE STAUSBOLL, Chief Executive Officer, CalPERS
Intervenor-Defendant:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Michael Dragovich, et al v. US Department of the Treasury, et al
as 12-16461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Joseph Banister v. United States Department of th, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-15961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R. BANISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Treasury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Steve Baldwin, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-56374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE BALDWIN and PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA L. SOLIS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 10-35076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., AKA Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. and MULTICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN OREGON
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.