Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Howard Ackerman v. State of Nevada Department of, et al
as 12-15543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOWARD ACKERMAN, on his own behalf and on behalf of a class of those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN SANDOVAL, in his official and individual capacity, ROSS MILLER, in his official and individual capacity and others
Annie Scales v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-15219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIE MAE SCALES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, Governor, DEBRA SCOTT, State Administrator and MICHELE LENTZ, Nurse Practitioner
David Johnson v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 11-17428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ROSS MILLER, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO and others
James Davis v. City of Las Vegas, et al
as 11-15407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Rome Chacon v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 10-17053
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROME RICHARD CHACON
Respondent - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Keith Brooks v. Frankie Del Papa, et al
as 10-15860
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Darryl White v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 10-15659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL LLOYD WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, GREG COX, DWIGHT NEVEN and others
Ronald Collins v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 09-17514
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD W. COLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Johnny Camargo v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 09-17236
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY CAMARGO
Respondent - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Calvin Jackson v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 09-17239
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN O'NEIL JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL, STATE OF NEVADA and BRIAN SANDOVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
