Cases 51 - 60 of 1,457
Schelton Jones v. People of California
as 23-55746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCHELTON JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
United States of America v. Jones
as 23-1932
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MEKAYDA D. JONES
Jones v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD JOSEPH JONES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, named as United States Dept. of Justice, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Jones v. Uttecht
as 23-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN A JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Correctional Center
Darryl Dunsmore v. Gena Jones, et al
as 23-55677
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Respondent / Appellee:
GENA JONES, Acting Warden at the California Health Care Facility and ROB BONTA
Henry Jones v. P. Horn
as 23-55650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY A. JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
P. HORN
Aaron Raiser v. United States District Court for the Southern Dist, et al
as 23-55635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON RAISER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ALL NON-JUDICIAL STAFF OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERVISING JUDGE, Pro Se Staff and others
Kate Adams v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 23-15970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATE ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SCOTT JONES, Sheriff
Dennis Jones v. David Shinn
as 23-15958
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Johnny Jones, III v. USDC-NVR
as 23-70121
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOHNNY LEE JONES III, SGT. STOLK, CHET RIGNEY and others
Petitioner:
JOHNNY LEE JONES III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
