Cases 51 - 60 of 703
Frear Schmid, et al v. County of Sonoma
as 23-15314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID and ASTRID SCHMID
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SONOMA, by and through its Permit and Resource Management Department
Burns Paiute Tribe, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15261
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE, RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Bartell Ranch LLC, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Plaintiff:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Sam Monet v. Edward Underwood, et al
as 23-15237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MONET
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD UNDERWOOD, DLNR Administrator, in his official and individual capacity, GORDON WOOD, Working Group Chairman, in his official capacity and as an individual and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, in his official capacity, HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DLNR and others
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Los Padres Forestwatch, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-55054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, , in his official capacity as Supervisor of the Los Padres National Forest and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION and ASSOCIATED CALIFORNIA LOGGERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
