Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Jane Doe v. City of San Diego, et al
as 14-56005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, WILLIAM LANSDOWNE, Chief of Police, DAVID BEJARANO, Chief of Police and others
Rudy Villeda Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71587
Petitioner:
RUDY ALEXANDER VILLEDA MEJIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Mary Sussex, et al v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LL, et al
as 14-15166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ANN SUSSEX, MITCHELL PAE, MALCOLM NICHOLL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TURNBERRY/MGM GRAND TOWERS, LLC, MGM GRAND INC., doing business as MGM Mirage, TURNBERRY/HARMON AVE., LLC and others
Mary Sussex, et al v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LL, et al
as 14-15166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY ANN SUSSEX, MITCHELL PAE, MALCOLM NICHOLL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TURNBERRY/MGM GRAND TOWERS, LLC, MGM GRAND INC., doing business as MGM Mirage, TURNBERRY/HARMON AVE., LLC and others
USA v. Rudy Martinez
as 13-10675
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUDY MARTINEZ
Rudy Tafoya v. Ken Clark
as 13-57108
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDY TAFOYA
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK
Rudy Monterroso v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74053
Petitioner:
RUDY AROLDO MONTERROSO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Rudy Espudo
as 13-50543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUDY ESPUDO, AKA Crazy
USA v. Rudy Espudo
as 13-50543
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDY ESPUDO, AKA Crazy
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Areli Vences-Navarette
as 13-10556
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELI VENCES-NAVARETTE, AKA Nestor Garcia-Lopez, AKA Roberto Lopez-Pena, AKA Nestor Lopez-Pompa, AKA Rudy Martinez-Lopez, AKA Raul Vences-Nava, AKA Nestor Vences-Navarette
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
