Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff: MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor: WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Waller v. City of Nogales, et al.
as 24-1864
Plaintiff: CORA J. WALLER, on her own behalf and as a personal representative of the estate of Glen Ray Cockrum, Jr.
Defendant: CITY OF NOGALES, ROY BERMUDEZ, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ and others
Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-70179
Not Classified By Court: In re: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official Capacity, WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, in his official capacity, MI FAMILIA VOTA and others
Petitioner: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official capacity
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee: CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee: CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16490
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, VOTO LATINO and PRIORITIES USA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant: KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona, LARRY NOBLE, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Apache County Recorder, DAVID STEVENS, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, previously named as David Stephens and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: YUMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?