Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Festus Ohan v. AMA, et al
as 23-35571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARD, (FSMB) and others
Festus Ohan v. AMA, et al
as 23-35434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARD, (FSMB) and others
Gary Alexander, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 21-15194
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan Alexander, CORINNA KLEIN and DAVID HAFFNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), SECRETARY OF LABOR, NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM, et al. and others
David Wit, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 20-17363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATASHA WIT, BRANDT PFEIFER, on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer, CORINNA KLEIN and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MARY JONES and LINDA TILLITT
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, NATIONA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Apt. Assn of Greater L.A. v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 20-56251
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive, ERIC GARCETTI, in his official capacity as Mayor of Los Angeles, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APARTMENT ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, INC., DBA Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALLIANCE OF CALIFORNIANS FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ACTION and STRATEGIC ACTIONS FOR A JUST ECONOMY
Amicus Curiae:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT HOUSING, UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, UCLA LUSKIN INSTITUTE ON INEQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY, UCLA CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD KNOWLEDGE, PROFESSOR ANANYA ROY AND PROFESSOR PAUL ONG and others
AAM v. Xavier Becerra
as 20-15014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
Practice Mgmt. Info., et al v. AMA
as 94-56774
Undetermined:
THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, an Illinois nonprofit corporation and PRACTICE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CORPORATION, a California corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
