Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Montana Public Interest Research Group, et al. v. Jacobsen, et al.
as 24-2811
Plaintiff:
MONTANA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP and MONTANA FEDERATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Defendant:
CHRISTI JACOBSEN, in her official capacity as Montana Secretary of State, AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as Montana Attorney General and CHRIS GALLUS, in his official capacity as Montana Commissioner of Political Practices
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and MONTANA REPUBLICAN PARTY
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Greenwood v. Pierce County Municipality, et al.
as 23-3497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT MICHAEL GREENWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, J SLOTHOWER, HSA, RN, MIGUEL BALDERRAMA, MD and others
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner:
JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16022
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ANDREW D. PARKER, PARKER DANIELS KIBORT, LLC, KURT B. OLSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Kari Lake, et al v. Bill Gates, et al
as 23-16023
Plaintiff:
KARI LAKE and MARK FINCHEM
Appellant:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, REX SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and others
Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, et al
as 23-55256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE VICTOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWEST WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, WALLYS AUCTION HOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, MEL-JEN, a California limited liability company and others
Sam Monet v. Edward Underwood, et al
as 23-15237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MONET
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD UNDERWOOD, DLNR Administrator, in his official and individual capacity, GORDON WOOD, Working Group Chairman, in his official capacity and as an individual and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, in his official capacity, HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DLNR and others
Christy Rose v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-35001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTY ROSE
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Christy Palmer, et al v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., et al
as 22-80133
Respondent:
CHRISTY PALMER, VARTAN PIROUMIAN, BRIAN COX and others
Petitioner:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP. and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
