Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Travis King, et al v. Demichael Dews, et al
as 22-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRAVIS SCOTT KING, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Breana Raymundo and BREANNA RAYMUNDO
Defendant / Appellee: DEMICHAEL DEWS, CALVIN NEE and JOHN TRAN
Defendant: RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Maricela Ramirez v. Joshua Kornegay, et al
as 21-35645
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARICELA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee: JOSHUA KORNEGAY, M.D., SARAH GOMEZ, M.D., ADDRIENNE HUGHES, M.D. and others
Lori Dew, et al v. City of Seaside, et al
as 21-15882
Plaintiff / Appellant: G. V., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Maryanne Gould, L. V., W. V. and others
Defendant: CITY OF SEASIDE and ABDUL PRIDGFEN
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER MANUEL FERNANDEZ
David Dew v. Shawn Hatton, et al
as 17-56268
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID L. DEW
Respondent - Appellee: SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Warden of Correctional Training Facility- Soledad and SCOTT KERNAN
Clarence Dews v. Dave Davey
as 14-72611
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Clarence Dews v. County of Kern, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16423
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF KERN and CITY OF WASCO
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-71182
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-70751
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-70559
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-72664
: In re: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: MAURICE JUNIOUS, Warden, MARTIN D. BITER, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?