Cases 1 - 8 of 8
John Todd v. Donnie Boyd, et al
as 21-35243
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS CLEARLY, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Multnomah County Assistant District Attorney, KLAMATH ANIMAL SHELTER, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Oregon Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. TODD
Mackenzie Brown, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 20-15568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACKENZIE BROWN, a single woman
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA and ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a constitutionally created body corporate, DBA University of Arizona
Defendant:
RICHARD A. RODRIQUEZ and RITA RODRIQUEZ
Not Yet Classified:
LIDA DEGROOTE
Andrew DeGroot, et al v. USA, et al
as 17-56674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW HARRY DEGROOT and TERESA DEGROOT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES, 1-20, inclusive
Bryan Ransom v. D. Ortiz, et al
as 12-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ORTIZ, Associate Warden of CSP-Corcoran, A. CANTON, Director's Level Appeals Examiner at CDCR Headquarters, P. FLORES, Correctional Sergeant at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and others
Kabita Choudhuri v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al
as 11-17735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KABITA CHOUDHURI
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., CIT GROUP, INC., Successor Vericrest Financial, Inc., FIRST AMERICAN LOAN STAR and others
Bryan Ransom v. D. Ortiz, et al
as 11-16970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ORTIZ, A. CANTON, P. FLORES and others
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 11-16157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, G. LILLY, B. ESPINOZA and others
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 10-17591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, P. FLORES, D. ADAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
