Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35522
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laney Sweet, et al v. LQ Management LLC, et al
as 22-15771
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellee: LQ MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CHARLES J. LANGLEY and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Philip Brailsford, et al
as 22-15269
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD and CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife
Defendant: CHARLES J. LANGLEY, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, BRIAN ELMORE and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley, et al
as 22-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES J. LANGLEY
Defendant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16118
Plaintiff - Appellee: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver, GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES J. LANGLEY
K. M., et al v. Regence Blueshield, et al
as 14-35108
Plaintiff - Appellee: K. M., by and through his parents and guardians, L.M. and E.M., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, B. S., by and through his parents and guardians, E.S. and R.S., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, GARRIGAN LYMAN GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: REGENCE BLUESHIELD and CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., FKA The Regence Group
Kadant Johnson Inc. v. Joseph D-Amico, et al
as 12-35411
Appellee: In re: E.S. CONSTANT COMPANY, Non-party subpoena recipient
Plaintiff - Appellee: KADANT JOHNSON INC.
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH V. DIAMICO, LOUISIANA STEAM EQUIPMENT, LLC, UTILITIES OPTIMIZATION GROUP, LLC and others
J2F Productions Inc., et al v. Jason Sarrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-55681
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: J2F PRODUCTIONS INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: JASON SARROW, an individual, DBA E.E. Morris Presents, DBA ICP Films
Counter-defendant - Appellant: DOUGLAS JACOBSON, an individual
G., et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of, et al
as 11-15578
Plaintiff - Appellant: G., parent and next friend of K., a disabled minor child, D., parent and next friend of E., a disabled minor child, M., parent and next friend of I., a disabled minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, LILLIAN B. KOLLER, Director, State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF and others
Marcus Ellington v. E.S. Alamieda, et al
as 09-17383
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: E.S. ALAMIEDA, Director, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, D. L. RUNNELS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?