Cases 1 - 10 of 20
James Jordan v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al
as 23-55647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC., PERYIS YUVONTE RICHARD BLAIN and JAMES HAROLD DEMPSEY
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 22-16773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Marty Ferguson v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., et al
as 22-55830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTY RICHARD FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC., CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55409
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gary Easley v. State of California, et al
as 21-15702
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, County of Santa Clara, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
State of Washington v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 20-35762
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Brenda Moore v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.
as 19-55338
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-56140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Riverside v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al
as 17-56026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a California charter city and municipal corporation, and as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside
Defendant - Appellant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
