Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shree Shiva, LLC v. City of Redding, et al
as 22-15395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHREE SHIVA, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF REDDING, DEBRA WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
BUILDING ADVENTURES, INC. and RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD
Shree Shiva, LLC v. City of Redding, et al
as 21-17003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHREE SHIVA, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF REDDING, DEBRA WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
BUILDING ADVENTURES, INC. and RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD
Narendra Sharma v. City of Redding, et al
as 20-16460
Defendant:
RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT and CITY OF REDDING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NARENDRA SHARMA
Narendra Sharma v. City of Redding, et al
as 20-15818
Defendant:
RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT and CITY OF REDDING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NARENDRA SHARMA
James Wright, Jr. v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 18-16172
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WRIGHT, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rick McLellan v. State of Nevada Department, et al
as 18-15529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK MCLELLAN
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CHRIS PERRY, in his individual capacity, JAROLD HAFEN and others
Matthew Corzine v. Adam Laxalt, et al
as 17-16605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CORZINE
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES WRIGHT, Director of NV Dept. of Public Safety, NATALIE WOOD, Chief of the Division of Parole and Probation and others
Gordon Wright v. J. Hamlet
as 11-17853
Petitioner - Appellant:
GORDON JAMES WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
J. HAMLET, Warden
Dana Smith v. United States District Court
as 10-71912
:
In re: DANA LYDELL SMITH
Petitioner:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Respondent:
USDC, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
NICOLE CANNON, STATE OF IDAHO, BARRY WOOD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
