Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Prabhjot Kang v. Western Governors University
as 23-35286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRABHJOT KAUR KANG
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15694
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Manjit Rai
as 22-15002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANJIT KAUR RAI, Esquire, AKA Manjit Kaur Kang
Chen v. Garland
as 21-1298
Petitioner:
XIANG KANG CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Christopher Gates v. King County Correctional, et al
as 21-35875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. GATES
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION, PASCAL HERZER, Civil Prosecutor and others
Steven Baker, et al v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.
as 21-15716
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELANIA KANG, a California general partnership, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DBA Chloe's Cafe and STEVEN BAKER, DBA Chloe's Cafe
Katherine Owen v. City of Hemet, et al
as 21-55240
Defendant / Appellee:
H. P. KANG, City Planning Supervisor, in official capacity and CITY OF HEMET
Defendant:
LIONEL MARTINEZ, Code Enforcement Manager, in official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE AVILLA OWEN
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16537
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C., LLG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
