Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Weyerhaeuser Company, et al. v. National Interstate Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-3066
Plaintiff: WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, a Washington corporation, WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY, a Washington corporation and ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED, a company formed under the laws of England and Wales
Defendant: NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation and others
Lexington Insurance Company v. Martin Mueller, et al
as 23-55144
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN A. MUELLER, in his official capacity as Judge for the Cabazon Reservation Court and DOUG WELMAS
Lexington Insurance Company v. Martin Mueller, et al
as 23-55193
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant: MARTIN A. MUELLER, in his official capacity as Judge for the Cabazon Reservation Court and DOUG WELMAS
Lexington Insurance Company, et al v. Cindy Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35784
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant / Appellee: CINDY SMITH, in her official capacity as Chief Judge for the Suquamish Tribal Court, ERIC NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Chief Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals, BRUCE DIDESCH, in his official capacity as Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SUQUAMISH TRIBE
Samantha B., et al v. AIG Claims, Inc., et al
as 22-55141
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMANTHA B. and DANIELLE W.
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL F.
Defendant / Appellee: AIG CLAIMS, INC., LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES, 1 to 30, inclusive
Defendant: AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
Type: Contract Insurance
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisc, et al v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 21-16557
Plaintiff / Appellant: MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSIN, MENOMINEE INDIAN GAMING AUTHORITY, DBA Menominee Casino Resort and WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S - SYNDICATES: ASC 1414, XLC 2003, TAL 1183, MSP 318, ATL1861, KLN 510, AGR 3268, UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S - SYNDICATE: CNP 4444 and others
Maison D'Artiste v. AIG, et al
as 21-80021
Respondent: DOES, 1-100, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Petitioner: MAISON D'ARTISTE, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated
King County v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 20-35475
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant: KING COUNTY, a Washington municipal corporation
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56027
Defendant / Appellee: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56102
Defendant / Appellant: SWISS RE INTERNATIONAL SE ZURICH, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?