Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16160
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Mirsad Hajro, et al v. USCIS, et al
as 12-17765
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIRSAD HAJRO and JAMES R. MAYOCK
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, T. DIANE CEJKA, Director, USCIS National Records Center, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, USCIS District Director of San Francisco and others
Mirsad Hajro, et al v. USCIS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17948
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIRSAD HAJRO and JAMES R. MAYOCK
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, T. DIANE CEJKA, Director, USCIS National Records Center, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, USCIS District Director of San Francisco and others
Edward Sofowora v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 10-17701
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD SOFOWORA
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, ROBIN F. BAKER, Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15873
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15352
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15342
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35098
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Sylvester Owino v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 09-56975
Petitioner - Appellant: SYLVESTER OWINO, AKA Sylvester Otieno-Owino
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, ROBIN BAKER, Director of San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?